Resolution humanoid Park Chauveau ?
Summary of the investigation
It will be recalled that the Garpan have made much of humanoid sightings reported to Chauveau Park, ranging from 1994 approximately 2011, particularly detailed photograph taken 18 June 2011, to 3:00 p.m., four girls who were baladées along the St. Charles River.
Conducted from several graphic designers, experienced researchers and investigators participated, has been one of the hardest that we have been dealing : proof course after months of reflection, none of our fellow ufologists, or member of the public had failed to provide the proper hypothesis to solve the anomalies surrounding the photograph.
After months of investigation and collaboration of several employees, here that the investigation of the humanoid Chauveau park resolves unexpectedly. Of course, when it is known, firstly, ultimately what it was and, other, the Parc Chauveau happening for years "special events" (see below), we can say it has been naive on the part of investigators have invested so much…
However, without the "key" that allows the resolution, we could see that indeed this case Close Encounter of the third kind (RR3) presented great difficulties since :
a. circumstances reported :
1. only the camera "saw" the humanoid, while control (indirect) went about twenty yards away ;
3. humanoid ghostly blur in the photo ;
4. equipment he wears seems incomprehensible and get lost in invisibility : we know that the invisibility humanoid mechanism is often at the waist : or, precisely his belt is the most enigmatic, lamp with a central ;
b. coincidences with other "real" cases of humanoids ;
c. the multitude of observations :
1. to 1992-96 : evidence of strange creatures that seem to hide ;
2. July 2007 : a young 15 years walking along the avenue Chauveau to 1:00 to 2:00 AM, sudden rustling his attention and he sees a humanoid 4 meters tall with a big head. it immediately for running a distance of 250 meters without looking back…
4. 18 June 2011 : this enigmatic photograph is taken :
Besides, before that residents of neighborhoods, we deliver the "secret", UFO or any member of the public had failed to properly resolve this case had all these interesting features from the point of view UFO.
It will be recalled that the various hypotheses and sometimes fiercely defended against the Garpan :
a. Assuming a cyclist (voir Fra C.Christave sur orandia.fr) : with the quality of photographs published, this assumption is reasonable first first eclipsed with the clearest pictures (yet available on our website). For example, we could not see it whole handlebar, Front wheel fork, or wheels or pedals:
b. Assuming a hoax : following authentication of the photo (still in the camera with the other photos of the session) and interview witnesses, this hypothesis became totally unsustainable.
c. Assuming a suit : after exclusion of the first two hypotheses, it became the most likely. But the strangeness of the details of photography, and especially the circumstances, just asking that each of these circumstances dussent be explained. Nous y revenons.
d. finally, various assumptions "aliens" : extra-terrestrial, intra-terrestrial, ghost, be interdimensional, Martian, Protoos, Scientific galactic, etc.. Especially since several aspects of the context of humanoid in this specific environment allow many surprising and comparative parallel with other "real" case of humanoid listed in the history of ufology.
The index and the resolution of the investigation
With virtual newspaper publications Quebec Express and The Current (Weekly Quebec), we have finally been informed that some special events were organized occasionally called "GN" Chauveau Park, or event "Grandeur Nature" type Dungeons and Dragons, and other fantasy worlds. Following this "Index", we contacted several groups and organizations who organize such events, for example Havens Ice, Arcadia, etc., and although none has confirmed we have never held such events Chauveau Park, we were able to talk with a real expert on these "events GN" — Mr. Carl Jacques de Arkadia Médiéval — for having participated in about 200, and organizing a hundred. More, it has previously crafted medieval costumes and other fantastic.
The dialogue we had with Mr. Jacques (voir solar site www.arkadiamedieval.com) has not only to understand the details of the costume, but especially — and the difficulty of the investigation was there — the reasons for the situation of the character in this environment and the reasons for its behavior in the context of the scenario in which he participated in all likelihood… By learning, we were finally able to emit a coherent hypothesis about the observation of July 2007…
What must be understood, the assumption is that the suit could not strictly alone solve the anomalies surrounding the fateful picture, and so that only a thorough investigation could solve this strange picture that might be considered "one of the best photographs ever taken of a non-human being equipped with technological instruments"…
Examples of finicky issues we faced, and also to meet all the anomalies surrounding the "costumed", Here are a series of questions and answers that demonstrate the difficulties we faced and professionalism that we have given :
Was it really a costume 'cheap' or a simple costume event GN ?
Not, not at all. If we compare this to suit those of these events, we see that c,is a very detailed suit, probably carried by a leader of the current scenario GN.
How to explain that the humanoid July 2007 was sighted at 1:00 to 2:00 at night ?
This is not surprising because just events "Grandeur Nature" (GN) continue throughout the night, and it is also the night parties are particularly popular…
How to explain that he measured four (4) meters ?
This may well be a player using "stilts". And elsewhere, its location near a boulevard, and the circumstances of the meeting, suggest that he was a secret to fear from. Also, the witness had he once saved running at full speed without looking back…
However, when we presented this case to the witness, he was not convinced of our explanation, et a dit : "Yet he had a very big head, and did not seem to wear clothes… »
For the photograph of the humanoid 18 June 2011, why no other costumed player has been seen ?
As this was probably a "fantastic script", and not a medieval scenario where cohorts are struggling, this may explain one "participant" was sighted.
Why thirty (30groin) pictures were scrambled near humanoid ?
We do not know.
If indeed this character plays a role, What kind of "fantasy races" is it ?
Probably a "living dead". You can see his mask that looks like a skeleton.
Why humanoid stood specifically for this place ?
Note that it is next to a cache, and especially, he stands next to a "big rock" (a block of concrete). Or, in the fantastic scenarios, often the "demons" are attached to their "tombstone".
How to explain that the orbits are so recessed and black eyes ?
It is this type of mask where a black nylon shields before the eyes:
Why his costume is it made of kinds of pipes ?
According to this scenario, it could be a "mutant demon", that "mute" and "transformed during the course of the game's storyline GN.
Conclusion and hesitations
If humanoid Chauveau Park is solved ? We after all, not only hypothesized the "costumed" detail, but we also solved many of the anomalies surrounding the fateful photograph 18 June 2011, and other events… It is noted that some of the anomalies could not be fully explained by the Garpan :
a. why the "costumed" appear so vague and ghostly, with what appears to be a "cloud of steam" escaping his neck ? The blurriness could it be explained by the projection of light from two lamps "player GN" ? The reason is probably that the unit is of average quality, and the subject of the photograph being distant from the photographer, the actual zoom of the camera is passed to digital zoom, which would explain the occurrence of abnormalities seen on objects far…
b. why photography is it IF SUCCESSFUL, and one photograph has captured the ? While, the logical answer is that it is hidden behind the tree trunk, that was her hiding place in the scenario). But then, if we assume that the "player GN" observed by far the photographer and he did it on purpose to show only once : it is astonishing that such behavior on the part of "player GN" has given such a photographic results. We are talking about taking "on-live", while the picture seems at first a "detailed and well mounted assembly"… We remain cautious and also surprised at the attitude and gesture of’ "Humanoid" that were seized "on-live", giving the impression that he was "surprised during an operation, and he reacted in the presence of witnesses coming towards him "…
c. it's still surprising that no other "player GN" has been seen as the four (4) witnesses (indirect) remained part of the afternoon at the scene. These events attract many participants and are far from silent…
d. finally, our hypothesis to explain the observation of July 2007 may seem lame, since it presupposes a "player GN" stood in a wooded area at night on large stilts… We note that the witness is not satisfied by our assumption…
We affirm that, in all probability, the famous picture reflects a character of "demon" in a "scenario Grandeur Nature", such that it would have produced Chauveau Park, and that, whatever :
a. we have not had confirmation that such an event took place on Saturday 18 June 2011 (the fact that it was made a 'Saturday’ however suggests) ;
b. we have not yet had a strict comparison with the "costume" of the "undead GN", of 18 June 2011 ». While many elements of the costume are easily explained (poitrail, mask, loin cloth, armbands, sneakers, arc), we are still looking for a "belt with light" similar to that seen in the photograph. Ideally, if we learn what group organized this supposed "event GN" of 18 June 2011, we could easily find out who played this role.
-Final against criticism GARPAN
As we just leave the door open to some hesitation, about anomalies may be unresolved, we would like to make a final against subcritical for at least have a clear position on this case — as you may have noticed in this article — is ultimately very nuanced and difficult to solve in every detail.
I often repeat in UFO formations we give and in our conferences, what distinguishes a "real UFO" are inevitable aspects and specific signatures, without which it is unlikely that either will really UFO :
1. UFO has a zigzag path, loops or curves, not just straight ;
2. UFO moves or off at a "breathtaking speed" ;
3. UFO has colors or unconventional forms for flying objects ;
4. paranormal events accompany the sighting or encounter.
It's a bit the same for humanoids, without certain criteria, It is unlikely whether a "be non-human" :
1. humanoid does not touch the ground, or legs are invisible, where he was found stealing ;
2. humanoïde l'est luminescent or phosphorescent ;
3. humanoid moves too fast, or inhumanely, or disappears on site, etc.. ;
3. paranormal events accompany the sighting or encounter.
We can therefore consider that, if our assumptions effectively solve the "pretense-d'anomalies (above mentioned), the "player GN" of 18 June 2011 none of the primary characteristics of a real humanoid.
Text by Yann VADNAIS. you. of enq.
A big thank you to TOBI for all assistance !